FAQ, Comments & Clarifications
Q: Homing Rockets are able to target all vehicles (and several other entities) this seems OP to give to organisations?
A: Very good point, it has been noted that homing rockets would be generally too easy. Instead, the launchers provided will not be homing.
Q: If the police force is outgunned, though not outnumbered, would the Akula be able to be activated?
A: On a case by case basis, this is possible but will be evaluated at the time of request.
Q: Bodycam recording should be required full the full duration of activation.
A: This is an excellent idea but may cause issues with extended situations and the limited storage space on some officers systems. I will review possible alternatives.
Q: PSC should be given final decision on punishments. Namely, police employment terminations.
A: Agreed, they and Cabinet will be included in decisions.
Q: What happens if the FRO is unavailable, and what level of government is able to activate in the FRO's stead?
A: Activations would be permitted by FRO, Managers & Executives (Excluding those members of the presently hostile organisation).
Q: In addition to the gunships, SRT should have a team whose 'cousins' are not associated with organisations.
A: Noted but this should be raised with the directors/Cabinet, this proposal will mandate no changes to SRT.
Q: AFP should be excluded from this department.
A: I'll consider it, but there is nothing inherently wrong with them activating (from a philosophical standpoint)
Q: Will there be only one FRO? What about deputies?
A: At this stage, yes.
Q: Can FRO be corrupt?
A: No, unlike the person who accused the FRO of corruption being the most corrupt officer in the city's history - you know who you are.
Q: The Akula can use tear gas bombs.
A: Yes, great idea. $50,000 each - max 6.
Q: It's stupid!
A: Yes, I'm glad you noticed...
Q: Sounds like it would be lame.
A: O rly?
Q: "Yeah let’s make the server a military roleplay server fuckin mint"
A: Coming from a member of the Apostles, this seems ironic... or at least hypocritical.
Q: Was this an April Fools' joke?
A: Yes
What I found amusing was how many people were very pressed then saw someone else say it could be an April Fools and tried to unreact/retract statements to pretend they were never fooled. You know who you are and yes I saw.
Many thanks to all for the extremely humorous discussions, direct messages, responses and outrage/fuss. I knew PD and the Orgs could be a little prickly, but goodness... (Not all of you, chill). I thoroughly enjoyed reading the various remarks. What some of you thought were viable ideas makes me frightened for any suggestions you make in future. Also, some of you may need to work a little on some self-reflection... some of those EOI question answers were... interesting.
Congrats to @Flexas the first person to outright state what was up - granted in dev chat. Sorry to our runner-up @Jackothegamer, since Ryan inadvertently helped you out, I consider your 'realisation' cheating - P.S. Cubix and I were messing with you in channel, he knew what was up sorry dude, it was just too good to pass up.